Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Really impressive how CMSA is turning this incident into a systemic learning opportunity rather than just fixing the immediate problem. The idea of embedding quality supervisors directly in devlopment teams means they're trying to catch the kind of issues that only emerge under operational stress. Most space agencies would just patch the specific failure mode, but building in permenant oversight roles suggests they're thinking about unknowable risks in future missions. That accelerated timeline for Shenzhou-23 will be the real test of whether the new quality framework can maintain standards under pressure.

Expand full comment
Edison's avatar

It is also high time that a new robust modular based assembly of the Shenzhou spacecraft be developed so that in case if any part of Shenzhou spacecraft damged then a smaller spacecraft could be launched to replace the defective part of the Shenzhou using a quickly assembled Small-Lift rocket. Smaller rockets like already available Kuaizhou are not hard to build and could be assembled and launched much quickly. Space debris is getting increased month by month , SpaceX is now launching almost 12 to 15 rockets per month , China is launching almost 7 rockets per month , then ISRO , ESA , JAXA and South korea too , so this means China needs to seriously tackle the space debris issue for the critical Shenzhou spacecraft as soon as possible. A small set of constellation sattelites should be built just to track and monitor the Shenzhou spacecraft vicinity so that debris collision could be avoided in advance and Shenzhou could be guided to deflect the space debris . Lastly , Shenzhou outer layers should be now made more robust in case of debris collision because debris is there all time waiting for a hit .

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?