Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Edison's avatar

Extremely bad move by Land Space because first they should prove to us successful recovery of the booster and then they should have gone for IPO . I would again recommend to Land Space to hold this IPO and wait for the successful recovery and technology demonstration of booster reuse , then I am sure they cannot just go for 7.5 billions RMB as they can even go for 15 billions RMB .

Neural Foundry's avatar

Fascinating breakdown on the cap structure here. Zhang holding just 6.7% equity but controlling 75% of voting rights is basically textbook asymetric governance in early-stage aerospace. I've seen similar setups in other sectors where founders want to maintain vision control while diluting for growth, but it gets tricky when burn rates stay this high relative to revenue. The 916M Yuan spend in 2024 against 4.3M revenue suggests theres still alot of R&D spend baked in before economies of scale kick in.

No posts

Ready for more?